Predictive Role of Serum Inflammatory Markers in Metastatic Luminal A/B Breast Cancers Receiving CDK-4/6 Inhibitors Therapy
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, cilt.14, sa.4, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 14 Sayı: 4
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1002/iid3.70442
- Dergi Adı: Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Anahtar Kelimeler: breast cancer, CDK-4/6i, metastasis, neutrophil and lymphocyte ratio
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background: We conducted this study to evaluate the impact of serum inflammatory markers and histopathological features on prognosis in metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with first line CDK4/6i (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors). Objectives: While serum markers are better indicators in triple-negative and HER-2 positive breast cancers, the PFS (progression-free survival) durations of NLR (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio), PLR (platelet/lymphocyte ratio), and LMR (platelet/lymphocyte ratios) in luminal A–B group patients vary between studies. In our study investigated whether baseline NLR, PLR, and LMR have a predictive value for PFS in hormone-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i. Material and Methods: The study included 111 patients with de novo metastasis or recurrence/metastasis after adjuvant/neo-adjuvant treatment who received CDK-4/6i as first-line therapy. NLR, PLR, LMR, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte values were recorded from peripheral blood analyses before CDK-4/6i treatment. Results: When the patient characteristics of patients were analyzed for progression-free survival, no statistically significant differences were found between age, ECOG, grade, Ki-67 index, and menopause status. PFS was not significantly associated with NLR, PLR, and LMR values (p = 0.87, p = 0.51, p = 0.22, respectively. In univariate analysis, among patients with LMR > 3.48, ribociclib was associated with longer PFS than palbociclib. Multivariate analysis revealed that the luminal B molecular subtype was associated with significantly worse PFS compared to luminal A (23 vs. 43 months, respectively, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The prognostic impact of serum inflammatory markers in hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer is heterogeneous. Although no statistical significance was observed in our cohort, high LMR levels may provide predictive and prognostic value in treatment selection.