The Impact of Different Telerehabilitation Methods on Peripheral Muscle Strength and Aerobic Capacity in COPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Advances in Respiratory Medicine, cilt.92, sa.5, ss.370-383, 2024 (ESCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 92 Sayı: 5
- Basım Tarihi: 2024
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/arm92050035
- Dergi Adı: Advances in Respiratory Medicine
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.370-383
- Anahtar Kelimeler: action observation, COPD, motor imagery, pulmonary rehabilitation, telerehabilitation
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Highlights: What are the main findings? Active muscle strengthening program has the same benefits as applying muscle strengthening program with action simulation methods to respiratory patients Telerehabilitation involving motor imagery and action observation is as effective as pulmonary telerehabilitation involving active strengthening exercises. What is the implication of the main finding? Motor imagery and action observation methods may be alternatives to increase the effectiveness of a strengthening program and active exercise amotivation in COPD patients. Cognitive rehabilitation can be a powerful alternative rehabilitation method for respiratory patients who cannot tolerate active exercise programs. Lung diseases have profound effects on the aging population. We aimed to hypothesize and investigate the effect of remote pulmonary telerehabilitation and motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) methods on the clinical status of elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Twenty-six patients were randomly assigned to pulmonary telerehabilitation (PtR) or cognitive telerehabilitation (CtR) groups. The programs were carried out 3 days a week for 8 weeks. The 6-min walk test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score, blood lactate level (BLL), measurement of peripheral muscle strength (PMS), and electromyography activation levels of accessory respiratory muscles were the main outcomes. There was a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05) in both groups in the 6MWT distance and in secondary results, except for BLL. Generally, in the mean muscle activity obtained from the electromyography measurement after the program, there were statistically significant increases in the PtR group and decreases in the CtR group (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant increase in PMS in both groups. An active muscle-strengthening program has the same benefits as applying the muscle-strengthening program to the patient as MI and AO. CtR can be a powerful alternative rehabilitation method in respiratory patients who cannot tolerate active exercise programs.