Humoral responses to the CoronoVac vaccine in healthcare workers
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, cilt.56, 2023 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 56
- Basım Tarihi: 2023
- Doi Numarası: 10.1590/0037-8682-0209-2022
- Dergi Adı: Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), CAB Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, Directory of Open Access Journals
- Anahtar Kelimeler: CoronaVac, Healthcare workers, Immunization
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background: This study aimed to assess the immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody response rate in emergency department (ED) healthcare workers (HCWs) and potential adverse effects after CoronaVac vaccination. Methods: All included HCWs were grouped based on the previous history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the number of vaccinations. Furthermore, the IgG antibody response was evaluated based on the sex and smoking status of HCWs. Those with a cut-off index of ≥1.00 after vaccination with CoronaVac were considered to have had COVID-19 and had an adequate humoral response. Results: Among 224 ED HCWs, 18% experienced the adverse effects of CoronaVac vaccine, the most prevalent being pain in the injection site. The IgG antibody response rate was 20% after the first dose of vaccine, while the response rate increased to 90% after the second dose. Female HCWs had higher IgG response rates compared with male HCWs (53.8 [15.9–147.0] vs 31.2 [4.5–124.0]). Non-smokers had higher IgG response rate compared with smokers (49.0 [11.5–160.5] vs 23.1 [7.4–98.5]). Conclusion: A single dose of CoronaVac does not produce a sufficient antibody response; hence, two doses are recommended. Men have a lower IgG response compared with women. Smokers had a lower IgG response rate compared with non-smokers. Therefore, it may be necessary to carefully assess the humoral responses of men and smokers when implementing a community vaccination program.