Cystatin C Mirrors Fibrosis Burden in Metabolic Syndrome: Insights from the Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fibrosis-5 Score


SALMANOĞLU M., Kazan S., YILDIRIM AYAZ E., Kılıç S., Kazan E., Ulu S.

Metabolites, cilt.16, sa.1, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 16 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/metabo16010071
  • Dergi Adı: Metabolites
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, Chemical Abstracts Core, EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: cystatin C, MAF-5, metabolic syndrome, hepatic fybrosis
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) comprises interrelated metabolic abnormalities that collectively confer increased risk of cardiovascular disease and hepatic morbidity. The MAF-5 score is a non-invasive prognostic marker of liver fibrosis and mortality, while Cystatin C (CysC) is a sensitive indicator of renal function that also reflects inflammation, atherosclerosis, and metabolic dysfunction. Although both MetS and CysC have been widely studied, their potential interplay via MAF-5 remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the relationship between MAF-5 scores and CysC levels in MetS patients for the first time. Materials and Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with MetS were included in this study. MAF-5 scores (based on waist circumference, BMI, diabetes status, AST, and platelet count) and CysC levels were recorded. The MAF-5–CysC relationship was assessed via Pearson correlation. Participants were grouped into MAF-5 quartiles, and continuous variables were compared using ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise tests. Results: We included 347 MetS patients (54.8% female, median age 54 years). The median MAF-5 score was 1.25, and MAF-5 correlated positively with CysC (r = 0.357, p < 0.001). CysC levels differed significantly across MAF-5 quartiles (Q1 = 0.96, Q2 = 0.99, Q3 = 1.06, Q4 = 1.09; p < 0.001), with Q4 showing higher values than Q1 and Q2. Conclusions: A significant correlation was found between MAF-5 scores and CysC in patients with MetS. CysC levels differed significantly across MAF-5 quartiles, suggesting a potential link between systemic inflammation, liver fibrosis, and CysC. These results highlight shared inflammatory and fibrotic pathways, underlying metabolic dysfunction. Clinically, combined assessment of MAF-5 and CysC may improve risk stratification, identifying patients at higher risk for hepatic fibrosis and adverse outcomes.