Evaluation of two different methods for hemoglobin screening of blood donors to use in mobile blood collection team Gezici kan toplama ekibinde kullanılmak üzere İki farklı hemoglobin tarama yönteminin değerlendirilmesi
TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, cilt.13, sa.5, ss.391-394, 2014 (Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 13 Sayı: 5
- Basım Tarihi: 2014
- Doi Numarası: 10.5455/pmb.1-1371120946
- Dergi Adı: TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.391-394
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Blood donor, Hemoglobin
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
AIM: The aim of the study is to compared two point-of care hemoglobin concentration measuring devices with laboratory measurements to determine their accuracy in mobile blood collection conditions. This two devices were the Pronto-7 (Masimo Corp., Irvine,CA) pulse co-oximeter and HemoCue Hb 201+ uses spectrophotometric method. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 152 individuals. The samples were tested for total hemoglobin measurement by three different, methods: noninvaziv pulse co-oximeter device Pronto-7, finger-stick blood sample on an automated spectrophotometric device HemoCue and venous samples on an automated hemotology analyzer (reference device). RESULTS: According to the venous samples (mean Hb value is 14.6 g/dl), the mean hemoglobin levels were detected slightly higher in the fingerstick samples (mean Hb value is 15.1 g/dl) and slightly lower in the pulse co-oximetry (mean Hb value is 14.1 g/dl). The sensivity of HemoCue, Pronto-7 was 97.7%, 81.6% and their specifity was 31.2% and %43.7, respectively. The positive predictive values (PPV) of HemoCue and Pronto-7 were high (92.3% and 92.5%, respectively) but both of their negative predictive values (NPV) were low (62.5% and 21.8%, respectively). Of blood donors, 88.4% (138/152) percent were correctly classified with HemoCue and 78.2% were with Pronto-7. COCLUSION: Taking automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement as a reference, Pronto-7 gave lower readings for Hb value and was less accurate than the Hemo-Cue system.