Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery ChatGPT for clinical use in labor management: A prospective cohort study


Yenİocak A. S., Tercan C., Dağdevİren E., Akay E., Aras D., Maş S., ...Daha Fazla

Zeynep Kamil Medical Journal, cilt.56, sa.3, ss.119-126, 2025 (Scopus, TRDizin)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 56 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.14744/zkmj.2025.31391
  • Dergi Adı: Zeynep Kamil Medical Journal
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.119-126
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: AI, artificial intelligence, ChatGPT4.0, labor, large language model, LLM, machine learning, ML, obstetrics, protraction
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, has shown promise in medical applications. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and generalizability of the large language model ChatGPT4.0 in predicting labor protraction. Material and Methods: A prospective, single-center cohort study analyzed retrospective data from 100 term pregnancies at low risk for labor protraction. The sample size was calculated using G*Power for 95% statistical power (minimum 46 patients). ChatGPT4.0 was tested on identifying 14 cesarean cases due to labor protraction and predicting active labor durations. The process was repeated after one week to assess consistency. Statistical analyses included Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney U, Fisher’s Exact, Friedman’s, and independent t-tests (p<0.05 significance). Results: ChatGPT4.0 achieved 80% overall diagnostic accuracy, with 28.57% sensitivity and 88.37% specificity at initial and follow-up predictions (p=0.105). However, predicted labor durations significantly differed from real-world data: initial (3.66±1.69 hours), follow-up (6.23±0.50 hours), and actual (5.17±2.80 hours) (p<0.001). The difference between initial and follow-up predictions was statistically insignificant (p=0.388). Conclusion: ChatGPT4.0 demonstrates high specificity in identifying labor protraction risks but shows inconsistencies in prediction accuracy, raising concerns about reliability and generalizability. Further research is needed to refine AI tools for clinical applications while ensuring ethical and safety standards. AI has potential in obstetric decision-making but requires rigorous evaluation before integration into practice. The significant limitation of ChatGPT is its restricted generalizability, largely due to the “black box” nature of the algorithm.