Determining the Best Tool Comparable with Global Initiative for Asthma Criteria for Assessing Pediatric Asthma Control
Pediatric, Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology, cilt.34, sa.3, ss.89-96, 2021 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 34 Sayı: 3
- Basım Tarihi: 2021
- Doi Numarası: 10.1089/ped.2020.1334
- Dergi Adı: Pediatric, Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.89-96
- Anahtar Kelimeler: asthma, pediatric asthma control test, asthma control test, pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire, lung function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background: Guidelines such as Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommend disease control as the mainstay of asthma management. Objective: To investigate which measure of asthma control best correlates with the GINA criteria for determining asthma control in children. Methods: Child asthma-patients at a tertiary hospital were enrolled in the study after evaluation of response to treatment. Asthma control test (ACT)/pediatric asthma control test (PACT), Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and lung function parameters were evaluated. Patients were examined by asthma specialists and control status was evaluated based on GINA. Results: The median age (interquartile range) of patients was 10.7 (8.4-12.9) years, 57.9% of patients were boys. Of 228 children, 84.2%, 9.6%, and 6.1% displayed "well-controlled", "partially controlled", and "uncontrolled"asthma, respectively, according to GINA. The patients with "partially controlled"and "uncontrolled"asthma were grouped as "not well-controlled."The cutoff levels were 22, 21, and 5.9 for PACT, ACT, and PAQLQ, respectively, for determining "well-controlled"asthma (P < 0.001). With these cutoff values, ACT exhibited higher comparability with GINA than PACT and PAQLQ (κ = 0.473, 0.221, and 0.150, respectively, P < 0.001). PAQLQ had higher agreement with GINA criteria in children ≥12 years old (κ = 0.326, P < 0.001 and κ = 0.151, P = 0.014, respectively). Correctly classified patients with PACT, ACT, and PALQLQ based on GINA with these cutoff levels were 93 (64.1%), 63 (75.9%), and 139 (62.9%), respectively. FeNO and lung function parameters were unsuccessful at revealing control status according to GINA. Conclusion: ACT is better than PACT for comparability with GINA. Better correlation of PAQLQ and ACT and better comparability of PAQLQ and GINA were evident in older children.