Our clinical experience with non-cemented total hip revision arthroplasty Cimentosuz total kalça revizyon artroplastisinde klinik deneyimlerimiz.
Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, cilt.37, sa.1, ss.1-8, 2003 (Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 37 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2003
- Dergi Adı: Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-8
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the results of non-cemented revision arthroplasty in patients who had undergone cemented total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty patients (12 women, 8 men; mean age 72 years; range 61 to 84 years) underwent non-cemented revision arthroplasty after a mean of 9.4 years (range 3 to 16 years) following primary surgery. The mean follow-up period was 4.5 years (range 3 months to 6.3 years). RESULTS: During revision arthroplasty, femur fractures were observed in three patients (15%). Three patients (15%) had femoral cortex perforations. Trochanteric osteotomy was performed in five patients (25%). The mean Harris hip score after the operation was 76.7 (range 50 to 90). The results were excellent in three patients (15%), good in seven (35%), fair in seven (35%), and poor in three patients (15%). CONCLUSION: Despite a high intraoperative complication rate during non-cemented revision total hip arthroplasty, we believe that non-cemented revision should be the preferred method because of low infection and low aseptic loosening rates.