Local Anesthetic Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Does It Affect Uroflowmetry Results
International Journal of Urology, cilt.33, sa.2, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 33 Sayı: 2
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.1111/iju.70377
- Dergi Adı: International Journal of Urology
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, Gender Studies Database, MEDLINE, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Anahtar Kelimeler: local anesthesia, prostate cancer, transperineal prostate biopsy, uroflowmetry, voiding function
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objectives: Transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-Bx) is increasingly preferred due to its lower infection risk and improved clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates. Its feasibility under local anesthesia provides both clinical and economic advantages. However, acute urinary retention (AUR) remains a significant post-procedure concern. This study aims to evaluate the impact of transperineal prostate biopsy performed under local anesthesia on voiding function using uroflowmetry parameters. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 74 patients. TP-Bx was performed under local anesthesia using a freehand technique. Uroflowmetry parameters, including maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax, mL/s), average urinary flow rate (Qave, mL/s), voided volume (Vv, mL), and post-void residual volume (PVR), were assessed before and after the procedure to evaluate its impact on voiding function. Results: The average changes in Qmax and Qave between pre and post procedure were 1.78 ± 4.33 and 0.63 ± 1.70, respectively. A significant reduction in Qmax and Qave was observed after TP-Bx (p < 0.001). PVR increased after TP-Bx (p < 0.001); however, these changes were mild and did not require catheterization. Conclusion: With increasing experience, TP-Bx has become safer. The use of local anesthesia reduces anesthesia-related complications, and the historically feared risk of AUR appears lower than previously assumed. These findings support TP-Bx as a safe and effective diagnostic approach.