Integrating Feature Selection, Machine Learning, and SHAP Explainability to Predict Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Creative Commons License

Ustaalioğlu İ., Ak R.

Diagnostics, cilt.15, sa.19, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 15 Sayı: 19
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/diagnostics15192473
  • Dergi Adı: Diagnostics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: pancreatitis, machine learning, risk assessment, predictive modeling, feature selection
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background/Objectives: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) carries substantial morbidity and resource burden, and early risk stratification remains challenging with conventional scores that require serial observations. The aim of this study was to develop and compare supervised machine-learning (ML) pipelines—integrating feature selection and SHAP-based explainability—for early prediction of SAP at emergency department (ED) presentation. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort was conducted in a tertiary-care ED between 1 January 2022 and 1 January 2025. Adult patients with acute pancreatitis were identified from electronic records; SAP was classified per the Revised Atlanta criteria (persistent organ failure ≥ 48 h). Six feature-selection methods (univariate AUROC filter, RFE, mRMR, LASSO, elastic net, Boruta) were paired with six classifiers (kNN, elastic-net logistic regression, MARS, random forest, SVM-RBF, XGBoost) to yield 36 pipelines. Discrimination, calibration, and error metrics were estimated with bootstrapping; SHAP was used for model interpretability. Results: Of 743 patients (non-SAP 676; SAP 67), SAP prevalence was 9.0%. Compared with non-SAP, SAP patients more often had hypertension (38.8% vs. 27.1%) and malignancy (19.4% vs. 7.2%); they presented with lower GCS, higher heart and respiratory rates, lower systolic blood pressure, and more frequent peripancreatic fluid (31.3% vs. 16.9%) and pleural effusion (43.3% vs. 17.5%). Albumin was lower by 4.18 g/L, with broader renal–electrolyte and inflammatory derangements. Across the best-performing models, AUROC spanned 0.750–0.826; the top pipeline (RFE–RF features + kNN) reached 0.826, while random-forest-based pipelines showed favorable calibration. SHAP confirmed clinically plausible contributions from routinely available variables. Conclusions: In this study, integrating feature selection with ML produced accurate and interpretable early prediction of SAP using data available at ED arrival. The approach highlights actionable predictors and may support earlier triage and resource allocation; external validation is warranted.