Revised Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Agha, Riaz; Mathew, Ginimol; Rashid, Rasha; Kerwan, Ahmed; Al-Jabir, Ahmed; Sohrabi, Catrin; Franchi, Thomas; Nicola, Maria; Agha, Maliha; Thoma, Achilleas; Coppola, Alessandro; Beamish, Andrew; Noureldin, Ashraf; Rao, Ashwini; Vasudevan, Baskaran; Challacombe, Ben; Pramesh, C.S.; Pagano, Duilio; Millham, Fredelrick; Roy, Gaurav; Kadioglu, Huseyin; Nixon, Iain; Mukherjee, Indraneil; McCaul, James; Albrecht, Joerg; Rivas, Juan; Karanth, K; Raveendran, Kandiah; Hammad Ather, M.; Thorat, Mangesh; Bashashati, Mohammad; Chalkoo, Mushtaq; Muensterer, Oliver; Bradley, Patrick; Goel, Prabudh; Pai, Prathamesh; Shinde, Priya; Ranganathan, Priya; Mohamed, Raafat; Rosin, Richard; Cammarata, Roberto; Coppola, Roberto; Wynn, Rolf; Surani, Salim; Giordano, Salvatore; Massarut, Samuele; Raja, Shahzad; Basu, Somprakas; Enam, Syed; Zun, Teo; Manning, Todd; Kasivisvanathan, Veeru; La Vaccara, Vincenzo; Mei, Zubing

doi:10.70389/pjs.100080

Revised Preferred Reporting of Case Series in Surgery (PROCESS) Guideline: An Update for the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Agha R. A., Mathew G., Rashid R., Kerwan A., Al-Jabir A., Sohrabi C., ...Daha Fazla

Premier Journal of Science, cilt.10, ss.1-14, 2025 (Scopus)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 10
Basım Tarihi: 2025
Doi Numarası: 10.70389/pjs.100080
Dergi Adı: Premier Journal of Science
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-14
Anahtar Kelimeler: AI reporting standards, AI transparency and ethics, Artificial intelligence in surgery, Delphi consensus process, PROCESS guideline update
Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

INTRODUCTION Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare and scientific publishing. Reporting guidelines need to be updated to take this advancement into account. The PROCESS Guideline 2025 update adds a new AI-focused domain to promote transparency, re-producibility, and ethical integrity in surgical case series involving AI. METHODS A Delphi consensus exercise was conducted to update the PROCESS guidelines. The panel comprised 49 surgical and scientific experts, who were invited to rate proposed new items. In Round 1, participants scored each item on a nine-point Likert scale and provided feedback. Items not meeting consensus were revised or discarded. RESULTS A 92% response rate occurred amongst participants (45/49) in the first round. Ratings were analyzed for agreement levels, and consensus was reached on all six proposed AI-related items. A revised PROCESS checklist is presented, which incorporates these new AI-related items. Authors are now expected to disclose AI involvement not only in patient care but also in man-uscript preparation, as exemplified by this paper. CONCLUSION The PROCESS 2025 guideline provides an up-to-date framework for surgical case series in the era of AI. Through a robust consensus process, we have added specific reporting criteria for AI to ensure that any use of AI in a case series is clearly documented, explained, and discussed, including considerations of bias and ethics. This update will help maintain the quality, transparency, and clinical relevance of the case series, ultimately improving their educational value and trust-worthiness for the surgical community.