What to Do for Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Pediatric Thyroid Nodules?


Creative Commons License

Uslu Z. Ö., Genel N., Küçükali E. T. T., Akın A., KARAMAN İ., ŞAHİN G., ...Daha Fazla

JCRPE Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, cilt.17, sa.4, ss.428-435, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus, TRDizin)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 17 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2024-11-21
  • Dergi Adı: JCRPE Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.428-435
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Pediatric thyroid nodules, rate of thyroid malignancy, thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy, the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology Classification, atypia of undetermined significance, nuclear atypia
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: International guidelines recommend different approaches for the management of pediatric thyroid nodules with a finding of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) on cytology. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) pediatric guidelines recommend surgery whereas the European Thyroid Association (ETA) guidelines recommend repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy after six months. Our objective was to identify markers of malignancy in AUS cases and to discuss the management of pediatric AUS nodules. Methods: Specimens from pediatric patients who underwent surgery due to AUS cytology were re-evaluated and subcategorized according to the 2023 Bethesda classification. Results: Of the 20 cases included, 11 (55%) were histologically benign, while 9 (45%) were malignant. On the subcategorization of AUS, nuclear atypia was present in 14 patients (70%), and other atypia in 6 patients (30%). Of the cases with nuclear atypia, 64.3% were malignant (n=9), whereas no malignancy was detected in cases with other atypia (p=0.012). Among the cytopathological features, chromatin clearing, nuclear enlargement, and irregular margins were significantly associated with malignancy (p=0.035, p=0.003, and p=0.012, respectively). Adhering to ETA recommendations would delay diagnosis by at least 6 months in 45% of our malignant cases. Conversely, performing lobectomy according to ATA recommendations may lead to unnecessary surgery in 55% of our cases. Conclusion: Based on our findings, lobectomy appears to be a more appropriate approach in AUS cases but only when nuclear atypia is present, to avoid diagnostic delay and unnecessary surgery. Guidelines should be updated according to the latest Bethesda classification.