Surveillance for Metastasis in Low-Risk Uveal Melanoma Patients: The Need for Optimization
Ophthalmology, cilt.132, sa.8, ss.895-902, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 132 Sayı: 8
- Basım Tarihi: 2025
- Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.03.019
- Dergi Adı: Ophthalmology
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Nature Index
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.895-902
- Anahtar Kelimeler: GEP, metastasis, surveillance, ultrasound, uveal melanoma
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of surveillance protocols using hepatic ultrasonography (US) at 6-month intervals to detect metastasis and determine its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with low-risk uveal melanoma (UM). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: A total of 144 consecutive patients with class 1 (low risk) primary UM were enrolled. Methods: All patients had negative baseline systemic staging, after which they underwent systemic surveillance with hepatic US at 6-month intervals: standard protocol (SP) or enhanced protocol (EP) using high frequency (US every 3 months) or enhanced modality (EM) (hepatic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging). Main Outcome Measures: Largest diameter of largest hepatic metastasis (LDLM), number of hepatic metastatic lesions, time to detection of metastasis (TDM), and OS. Results: Median follow-up time for those still alive (134 [10 patients died of any cause]) was 50.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 28.6–76.1). Surveillance was done with SP in the majority (101 [70%]) and EP in 43 (30%). A total of 834 US scans were obtained (median 5.0 [IQR, 3.0–8.0]) that led to the detection of metastasis in 6 patients by SP in the majority (5 of 6) and EP in 1 of 6. The median LDLM at detection was 2.8 cm. Only tumor largest basal diameter was significantly associated with increased hazard of metastasis (hazard ratio, 1.33 [95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.70]; P = 0.022), whereas age, tumor thickness, and PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) status were not. All patients were treated for metastasis (liver directed 1 [17%], systemic therapy 5 [83%]). Conclusions: The vast majority of patients with UM predicted to have a low risk of metastasis do not develop metastasis by 5 years (96%). Surveillance protocols in such patients have very low yield, and their impact on survival cannot be assessed. Our study demonstrates the need for further risk refinement of patients with low-risk UM to better identify at-risk individuals. Currently used surveillance protocols need to be optimized. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.