Closed reduction percutaneous pinning versus open reduction internal fixation in the treatment of intraarticular distal radius fractures: Mean four-year results Eklem içi uzanımlı distal radius kırıklarının tedavisinde kapalı redüksiyon perkütan pinlemeye karşın açık redüksiyon internal tespit: Dört yıllık sonuçlarımız
Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, cilt.27, sa.2, ss.238-242, 2021 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 27 Sayı: 2
- Basım Tarihi: 2021
- Doi Numarası: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.28934
- Dergi Adı: Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.238-242
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Distal radius fractures, intraarticular distal radius fractures open reduction internal fixation, percutaneous pinning, volar locking plate
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
BACKGROUND: This study was performed to compare the results of closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) versus open reduction internal fixation with a volar locking plate (ORIF) in the treatment of intraarticular distal radius fractures (IDRF) average four-year follow-up. METHODS: In this study, 43 patients had unilateral intraarticular distal radius fractures (type B and C) treated with CRPP (n=19; 11 males and eight females) and ORIF (n=24; 14 males and 10 females) were retrospectively evaluated. The mean follow-up was 50.3 months (12–74) at the CRPP group and 45.2 months (40–65) at the ORIF group. The mean age was 50.8 years (29–73) in the CRPP group and 51.5 (19–75) in the ORIF group. The patients were evaluated functionally and radiologically at the last follow-up. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups concerning follow-up, age, and gender. However, there was no statistical difference concerning grip power and the range of motion. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (Q-DASH) was better in the ORIF group. Voler tilt and radial height measurements were statistically significantly better in the ORIF group. Degenerative arthritis was 63% in the CRPP group and 41% in the ORIF group, and there was no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: ORIF with a volar locking plate has better functional and radiological results than CRPP in IDRF patients’ average four-year follow-up.