Management of Nipple Necrosis and Wound Complications in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study
Medicina (Lithuania), cilt.62, sa.3, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 62 Sayı: 3
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.3390/medicina62030575
- Dergi Adı: Medicina (Lithuania)
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Anahtar Kelimeler: breast cancer, skin-sparing mastectomy, implant-based breast reconstruction, nipple-areola complex necrosis, wound dehiscence, postoperative complications, wound management
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Background and Objectives: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the frequency of early-stage nipple necrosis and wound complications in patients undergoing unilateral skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and direct implant-based reconstruction and describe the conservative/advanced wound care approaches used for these complications. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was made of the medical records of 84 patients who underwent same-session unilateral SSM and implant-based reconstruction in the Surgical Oncology Clinic between November 2019 and February 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, Mann–Whitney U-test, and Chi-square/Fisher tests. Results: The mean age of the patients was 43.51 ± 6.5 years, 35.7% of the patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and smoking prevalence was 7.1%. Wound complications developed in 16.7% of the patients, distributed as follows: wound dehiscence 6%, NAC necrosis 8.4%, infection 1.2%, and hematoma 1.2%. Interventions due to complications were performed at rates of 2.4% for areola excision, 2.4% for debridement, and 2.4% for implant excision. The only variable significantly associated with complication development was excision volume, which was higher in the complication group (p = 0.033). Logistic regression analysis showed that a one-unit increase in excision volume was associated with a statistically significant increase in the likelihood of complication development (O.R = 1.002; 95% CI: 1.000–1.004; p = 0.019). No significant association was found between age, height/weight, neoadjuvant therapy, smoking, breast side, pathology subtype, axillary approach, and the development of complications (p > 0.05). Advanced wound management was provided in 10 of the 14 cases (71.4%) that developed complications. Conclusions: Excision volume was found to be the only variable associated with wound complication development after implant-based reconstruction following unilateral SSM. Most complications were managed successfully with advanced wound care, minimizing the need for re-operation. For patients undergoing high-volume excision, risk-based early multidisciplinary, close follow-up is recommended.