Reasons of lost to follow-up and clinical characteristics of Familial Mediterranean fever patients Ailevi Akdeniz ateşi hastalarının takipten çıkma nedenleri ve hastaların klinik özellikleri
Journal of Turkish Society For Rheumatology, cilt.18, sa.1, ss.31-36, 2026 (Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 18 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.4274/raed.galenos.2025.91300
- Dergi Adı: Journal of Turkish Society For Rheumatology
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.31-36
- Anahtar Kelimeler: characteristics of patients lost to follow-up, Familial Mediterranean fever, reasons for patients lost to followup
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objective: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), which is common in countries neighbouring the Mediterranean, requires regular follow-up like other chronic inflammatory rheumatological diseases. Deficiencies in the treatment and follow-up of the disease may result in significant morbidity. In this study, we investigated the reasons for non-follow-up of FMF patients and the clinical characteristics of these patients. Methods: FMF patients who had not attended rheumatology control for more than 1 year were included in this study. Patients were telephoned and asked the reasons of lost to follow-up. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were recorded. Modified Morinsky scale (MMS)-motivation and MMS-knowledge level questionnaires were applied for treatment compliance. Comparison was made between the patients with no follow-up and those with follow-up at an external centre. Comparison of the patient groups with follow-up and those without follow-up was made. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: It was learnt that of the 176 patients who could be contacted by phone, 74 (42.1%) patients were followed-up in external centres and 93 patients were lost to follow-up. Most of the patients lost to follow-up were university graduates (48.1%) and high school graduates (31.2%). The most common reasons of lost to follow-up were negligence (28%) and failure to find an appointment (25.8%). The variables of MMS-motivation, MMS-knowledge level and informing patients about the need for follow-up at diagnosis had a significant relationship with non-follow-up (p<0.05). Conclusion: The fact that “negligence” was found to be the most common reason of lost to follow-up despite the high educational status of FMF patients revealed the importance of informing even educated patients about the necessity of follow-up. This was supported by the fact that the MMS-motivation and MMS-knowledge level scores were low in patients lost to follow-up. In addition, setting the green list registrations as indefinite will reduce patients’ loss of follow-up.