Does the subtotal cholecystectomy rate for acute cholecystitis change with previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? ERCP öyküsü akut kolesistitte subtotal kolesistektomi oranını değiştirir mi?
Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, cilt.29, sa.7, ss.772-779, 2023 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 29 Sayı: 7
- Basım Tarihi: 2023
- Doi Numarası: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.54703
- Dergi Adı: Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.772-779
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Acute cholecystitis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common emergent surgeries. As a safe alternative in challenging operations, laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) is widely used. We questioned whether the results in acute cholecystitis cases changed with a history of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). When we searched the literature, we could not find a study focusing on the subtotal cholestectomy results in acute cholecystitis. In our study, we aimed to investigate whether the history of ERCP affects the rates of subtotal cholecystectomy (SC) in acute cholecystitis. METHODS: The results of patients (n=470) who underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis at our clinic between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups according to their history of ERCP. The primary outcome was the SC rate. The secondary outcomes were conversion to open, postoperative complications, serious complications, operative duration, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The standard group included 437 patients, whereas the ERCP group included 33 patients. A total of 16 patients underwent SC, with 15 in the standard group and 1 in the ERCP group. There was no significant difference in terms of SC rates between groups (P=0.902). While four cases of operation were completed with conversion to open in the non-ERCP group, no conversion was seen in the ERCP group (P=0.581). No significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of complications, serious complications, operation duration, length of hospital stay, and mortality. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that ERCP is not related to an increased rate of SC and conversion in patients with acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis can be safely performed in patients with a history of ERCP. LSC is a safe procedure in challenging patients, and fenestrating SC can be preferred to avoid hazardous consequences in such cases.