Circulating CXCL1 in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: context-dependent association with inflammatory load and metabolic indices
Endocrine Regulations, cilt.60, sa.1, ss.20-28, 2026 (Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 60 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.2478/enr-2026-0003
- Dergi Adı: Endocrine Regulations
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Central & Eastern European Academic Source (CEEAS), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals, Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.20-28
- Anahtar Kelimeler: biomarker modeling, CXCL1, decision curve analysis, inflammation; hs-CRP, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Objective. Metabolic syndrome (MS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) share a chronic low-grade inflammatory milieu driven by adiposity. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) has been linked to insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction, but its diagnostic relevance remains unclear. Methods. Our study employed a cross-sectional design and enrolled 104 adults: 52 newly diagnosed treatment-naive T2DM patients and 52 normoglycemic controls matched for age and sex. Serum CXCL1, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and metabolic parameters were measured. Logistic regression models to discriminate MS and T2DM status were constructed (base model: age, sex, BMI) and then expanded by adding hs-CRP, CXCL1, or both. Model performance was assessed for discrimination (AUC), calibration (Integrated Calibration Index [ICI], Expected Calibration Error [ECE]), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis, DCA) in accordance with TRIPOD 2024. Results. CXCL1 correlated with BMI (r=0.33, q=0.004) and hs-CRP (r=0.29, q=0.021), but not glycemic indices. For MS, CXCL1 marginally improved the base model (ΔAUC=+0.003, p=0.81); for T2DM, ΔAUC=+0.007 (p=0.60). hs-CRP performed better (AUC=0.744 for T2DM; 0.743 for MS) and the combined panel achieved the highest discrimination (AUC=0.769 and 0.745, respectively). Conclusions. CXCL1 reflects adiposity-related inflammation but provides only minimal incremental discrimination for metabolic syndrome and T2DM beyond conventional markers such as age, sex, BMI, and hs-CRP. The combined hs-CRP+CXCL1 panel achieved the best overall statistical performance, although its clinical utility remains limited. These findings emphasize the need for integrated multi-marker approaches rather than single-biomarker screening in metabolic risk assessment.